Frequently Asked Questions about Graduate Student Unionization






Who should vote?

Every eligible student should vote. Eligible voters include currently enrolled graduate and professional students who are teaching or performing research in spring 2018, or who taught or performed research in the spring, summer, or fall of 2017, in all of the following schools and programs: Annenberg School for Communication, Biomedical Graduate Studies, School of Design, Graduate School of Education, School of Arts and Sciences, School of Engineering and Applied Science, School of Nursing, School of Social Policy and Practice, and the Wharton School.

The election is determined by the majority of the votes actually cast, which means it is possible for a union to be elected by less than a majority of the individuals in the bargaining unit. If you are a graduate student in any of the schools and programs listed above and you teach or perform research, you are eligible to vote. According to the Labor Board, you will be deemed to consent to the outcome regardless of whether you vote in the election. So if you do not vote, and the union wins, it would still become your exclusive collective bargaining representative.

How will the election work? When would it be held?

The election dates and locations have not yet been set, but we will include that information as soon as it is confirmed by the NLRB. The election will be by secret ballot, which means no one else will know how you vote.

I’m an international student. Will I be eligible to vote?

Yes, you are eligible to vote. Citizenship or visa status is not an eligibility criterion.

Will other students know how I vote?

No. The election is by secret ballot and your vote is strictly confidential. No one will know if you vote yes or no to the union. 


What is the significance of the election?

If GET-UP wins the election, it will become the exclusive collective bargaining representative for all graduate students in all of the schools listed above. Penn then negotiates the terms and conditions relating to teaching and research with the union, and would be prohibited from negotiating those terms directly with any individual. Individual students in the unit would be bound by the outcome of the negotiations, regardless of whether they participated or supported the union.

What are the issues that would be covered in negotiations?

The National Labor Relations Act requires employers and unions to bargain over “wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.” Thus collective bargaining negotiations would cover the terms and conditions of graduate students’ teaching and research performed under the direct supervision of faculty members or research in faculty members’ laboratories. Although academic decision-making (including decisions about academic progress, mentoring, etc.) ought to be outside the scope of collective bargaining, it most likely would be affected by rules sought by the union in collective bargaining.

How are student interests represented in these negotiations? Do students get input into what they believe are the important problems and issues to be addressed? Who will run the union?

All of this is up to the union.

What would a union do for me as a graduate student?

The answer is unclear and depends on the outcome of collective bargaining. Although collective bargaining usually results in a contract, there are times when the parties are unable to reach agreement. Moreover, although federal labor law requires the parties to bargain in good faith, it does not require either party to agree to any proposal put forward by the other. Thus there is no guarantee that collective bargaining would result in any increase to stipends or benefits. In fact, students could be worse off in the long run under collective bargaining. A typical collective bargaining agreement results in a wage increase of two to three percent per year. This is considerably less than the average increase to stipends the University has implemented on its own, without collective bargaining – and that shortfall does not take into account the cost of union dues to be paid by students, which would further reduce real income.

Do all the employees in a bargaining unit have to pay membership dues to the union?

Yes. Under federal law, a union can require everyone in a bargaining unit to pay dues or to pay the union a similar agency or representation fee (an amount typically only slightly less than the dues). These dues are automatically deducted from employees’ paychecks in almost all cases.

How much would dues be?

The union decides how much to charge its members. Union dues are often set as a certain percent of the annual pay (or stipend) that the bargaining unit member is earning; in other cases, union dues are a flat annual rate. On top of dues, sometimes unions also require bargaining unit members to pay an initiation fee. Some union contracts provide that failure to pay union dues could result in dismissal from employment.

GET-UP is affiliated with the AFT, so information on AFT dues may be relevant. At Cornell University, a group of students who opposed unionization estimated that AFT union dues for each student “might range anywhere from $600 to $800 yearly,” based on dues charged by the local AFT union at Rutgers University (see In addition, some AFT affiliates require members to pay extra dues to have voting rights.

At NYU, according to the graduate student union’s web site, dues are 2% of compensation during the semesters in which a graduate assistant is employed in a union position, and dues are deducted from every paycheck. In addition to the dues, there is an initiation fee of approximately $50.

A union would not begin to collect dues until the union and Penn agree on a contract. But once a contract is in place, all students would pay dues or a similar fee.

Every dollar withheld from student stipends and paid to the union is transferred off campus to a third party. It is money lost to the University community, which might otherwise be available for initiatives related to scholarship, research, student support, or academic programming here at Penn.

What might a union prevent me from doing?

This would depend on the collective bargaining agreement and any bylaws or rules adopted by the union and applied to its members. However, based on what has happened at other institutions, it is likely that a collective bargaining agreement would impose seniority and unit work rules in place of faculty-student consultation in determining teaching and research assignments. You can see how this might work in grievances filed by the United Auto Workers on behalf of graduate students at NYU: Such rules and restrictions might prevent individual students and faculty members from collaboratively deciding on student teaching opportunities. For example, if an individual graduate student wanted to teach in a particular semester in order to schedule around a research opportunity, the department might not be able to accommodate that student’s request under the contract.

Can I see the proposed contract, including the list of terms and conditions of employment, before I decide how to vote?

No, because there is no such contract to show. Negotiations about specific terms and conditions of employment occur only after an election, if the vote is in favor of union representation.

If I object to a specific provision in a signed labor contract, am I still bound by it?

Yes. Collective bargaining does not allow individual bargaining unit members to opt out of specific rules. A union, as the exclusive bargaining agent, speaks for all members in the bargaining unit, and the contract is binding on all members.

If Penn wanted to improve a graduate student benefit covered by a collective bargaining agreement, would it be able to do so before the expiration of the contract?

No, not unless the contract granted the University the flexibility to do so, or if the union consented to the change. For example, when NYU increased stipends and partially subsidized the cost of health insurance for doctoral students, the union charged the university with an unfair labor practice for doing so without the union’s prior consent.

How would unionization affect faculty-student relationships?

The Labor Board considers faculty mentors to be “supervisors” acting on behalf of their employer with respect to their relationship with teaching assistants. As a result, if the union wins the election, faculty members would be restricted labor law in the same way the law constrains managers in an assembly plant supervising unionized workers. This change could potentially damage the collegial relationship between students and mentors.

If there were a union, what would happen to GAPSA and to University committees that include graduate student representation?

Committees that decide issues affecting “terms and conditions of employment” of graduate students would no longer be permitted to address those issues, as the union would be the exclusive bargaining representative. GAPSA, for example, would not be permitted to negotiate terms or conditions of employment, e.g., pay rates, because under federal law the union would be the exclusive bargaining representative.

Graduate students face significant financial burdens. Won’t we be better off with a union?

Not necessarily. Penn recognizes that for many graduate students it is hard to make ends meet, which is why we have continually improved funding and benefits packages over the past decade and a half. There is no guarantee that collective bargaining will result in increases to stipends or benefits. The only thing assured under unionization is that, with a contract in place, bargaining unit members will pay union dues, which the union will control.

Students advocating for unionization claim that Penn has not established adequate procedures to address sexual harassment and discrimination, or accommodations. Is this correct?

No. The University has long-standing, established, and effective policies designed to investigate, remediate, and eliminate sexual harassment and discrimination (, as well as sexual violence, relationship violence and stalking ( The Penn Violence Prevention website has detailed information regarding the policies, procedures and resources available to address sexual harassment, including sexual violence ( The University also has established student grievance procedures for addressing race and gender discrimination claims, which are outlined here:

As set forth in its policies, the University has two types of resources available for students with concerns regarding sexual harassment. There are confidential resource offices on campus that provide information, counseling and support and can assist students considering a formal complaint. These offices include the Special Services Unit in the Division of Public Safety, the Penn Women’s Center, the African American Resources Center, the LGBT Center, CAPS, and the Office of the Chaplain, all of which are available to all students. In addition, the University’s Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Programs is available to all members of the University community seeking assistance with initiating a complaint.

Students who wish to file a formal complaint directly may do so by submitting the complaint to the dean of the school or the Office of the Provost if the complaint is against a faculty member. If the complaint is against a staff member, it should be made to the supervisor of the person complained against, to the next level supervisor, to Human Resources or to the Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Programs. If the complaint is against a student, the complaint should be made to Office of Student Conduct or, if the complaint relates to a graduate or professional student enrolled in a school which has established a hearing board or other decision-making body, the complaint should be filed with that body. The Office of Student Conduct website has a list of these graduate schools and programs. The University’s Office of Student Disabilities Services also provides resources to all students, including graduate students, with requests for accommodations:

Would a union benefit international students?

Penn recognizes that international students face additional challenges, with respect to immigration law and other matters. The Office of International Scholar and Student Services is trained to provide support to Penn’s international students and is available for consultations at any time.

Union organizers have visited me at home. Is this permissible? 

Union organizers have the right to solicit your support, and the Labor Board requires Penn to provide GET-UP with contact information for any student within the bargaining unit, so it is possible union organizers may attempt to contact you at home or by telephone. However, you are not required to meet with or speak to them, nor are you required to sign any document expressing your support. If you are confronted by an individual at your residence who refuses to leave, or you are concerned about your personal safety, you may seek police assistance by calling 911 (or 215-573-3333 on campus for Penn Public Safety).

The University is taking steps designed to ensure it protects the privacy of student contact information to the maximum extent possible. This page will be updated with further information as it becomes available. If you are concerned about the privacy of your address and phone number, you may check your settings on your personal profile or contact the University Privacy Officer, Scott D. Schafer (

Is there an alternative to unionization?

Yes. The significant advancements in graduate student life at Penn over the last two decades have been made in partnership with GAPSA, SHIAC, and other student groups and University and School committees with student leaders as members. Students who wish to join the discussion regarding graduate student life at Penn are strongly encouraged to become active in GAPSA, their School-based student governments, and/or University-wide interest groups (a list of which is available at and to speak to staff at the Graduate Student Center about issues of concern to them. These organizations have been very influential in improving the lives of graduate students and the campus resources available to them.


For more information on Penn’s support for its graduate students, please visit:

What financial support does Penn currently provide to its graduate students?

The University of Pennsylvania has continually increased its financial support for graduate students to attract the best graduate students from around the world. Penn provides guaranteed funding to PhD students for four to five years or more and has established a variety of opportunities for students to obtain additional funding. Internal funding opportunities include travel grants, the GAPSA-Provost Award for Interdisciplinary Innovation, the President Gutmann Leadership Award, school-based dissertation completion fellowships and more. Furthermore, PhD students can receive guidance in applying for external funding through the Navigating the Grant Program, the Center for Undergraduate Research and Fellowships, and Career Services.

A typical incoming PhD student in the School of Arts and Sciences, which is home to the majority of our PhD students, receives a five-year graduate aid package that includes tuition, general fees, health insurance premiums, and an academic year stipend, plus three years of summer support, worth approximately $69,400 in the first year, or a total of over $347,092 in constant FY17 dollars.

What other services and resources does Penn provide to its graduate students?

Working with graduate student groups on campus, especially the Graduate and Professional Student Assembly (GAPSA), Penn has greatly enhanced services and resources available to graduate students. These include comprehensive resource centers, such as the Graduate Student CenterCenter for Teaching & LearningCareer Services, and Family Resource Center. Additionally, improvements to PhD educational policies across the Graduate Groups – such as annual progress reports and meetings of dissertation committees – are designed to make the PhD process more transparent and give our PhD students more support to progress academically and ensure timely completion.

Penn also provides a benefits-rich health insurance package to funded students, much of which has been added due to student representation on SHIAC (Student Health Insurance Advisory Committee), which annually reviews and renews the insurance plan. Over the years, this comprehensive coverage has grown to include an unlimited lifetime maximum benefit, prescription coverage, treatment for mental illness and substance abuse, comprehensive infertility coverage, and gender confirmation surgery. Beginning in the fall of 2017, the University will subsidize 50% of the cost of Penn dental insurance for all full-time PhD students as part of their funding package.

Penn is also committed to helping PhD students with children continue in the academic pipeline. The Family Grant Program was established in 2011 and provides need-based grants for PhD students to help cover expenses related to raising children, in addition to subsidized emergency backup care, free memberships, and childbirth/adoption accommodation for PhD students with children.

Two other new initiatives supporting our graduate students took effect in fall 2017. First, all full-time graduate and professional students have access to the Pottruck Health & Fitness Center, Sheerr Pool, and Fox Fitness Center covered in their general fee. Part-time students, who pay a reduced fee, have the option to purchase access to these recreational facilities at a reduced cost. Second, Penn has committed $1 million for need-based grants to PhD students in good standing to help defray the costs of extended health insurance, as well as dependent insurance and daycare for PhD students with spouses and children.

How do graduate students’ medical benefits compare with Penn employee medical benefits provided to faculty and staff? 

The Penn Student Insurance Plan (PSIP), for which all graduate students are eligible, offers the highest-quality care at a significantly lower cost than Penn’s employee medical benefits plans available to full-time faculty and staff members. The University provides PSIP medical benefits to funded students at no charge; University faculty and staff pay between $91 and $204 per month for individual coverage (with dependent coverage costing more than twice as much). PSIP’s annual out-of-pocket maximum of $900 also is lower than the out-of-pocket maximum in Penn’s employee plans. These are just some of the features of PSIP coverage. For more information, please visit this site:

In addition, dental insurance is cheaper for graduate students than employees. University employees participating in Penn’s dental insurance program pay $25-$36 per month, which over the course of a year is more expensive than the subsidized dental coverage now available to graduate students. Finally, graduate students are eligible for free appointments with Student Health Services as well as free sessions with CAPS, which are available on a walk-in basis for students, and are not available to employees at all.

What has happened at other schools?

Elections have been held at many schools over the past year and a half. At Duke, the union withdrew its petition to represent graduate students after a preliminary ballot count showed a majority voted against the union. At Cornell, more students voted no than yes, but the count is not yet final. At Harvard, a majority voted against the union, but the union challenged the election results, and the Labor Board has ordered a second election.  At Yale, students petitioned to form “micro-units” covering individual departments; this tactic is no longer consistent with curernt law. At Columbia and Chicago, students voted to form a union.


The following links offer additional viewpoints on graduate student unionization.

See what Penn graduate students who oppose unionization are saying:

The University of Chicago’s legal office summarized the effects unionization might have on academic practice there:

Duke University’s President Richard Brodhead offered his perspective on graduate student unionization, before the union withdrew its petition at Duke:

A group of Cornell students estimated AFT dues based on information from Rutgers AAUP-AFT:

The Harvard Crimson reported on two Harvard deans’ emails to students regarding unionization, as well as a union organizer’s response:

A Harvard graduate student’s blog, including his arguments against unionization:

A website maintained by Princeton graduate students addressing issues related to potential unionization: